Introduction
Crambidae Latreille, 1810 is one of the most species-rich families of Pyraloidea, comprising more than 10,000 described species worldwide (Léger et al., 2021). Within Crambidae, the genus BradinaLederer, 1863 belongs to the subfamily Spilomelinae Guenée, 1854 and currently comprises 94 described species worldwide (Nuss et al., 2003-2024). The genus is widely distributed across the Afrotropical, Oriental, Australasian, and Palaearctic regions, but its taxonomy remains insufficiently revised and the identification of several externally similar species is still difficult (De Prins and De Prins, 2011-2026).
In East Asia, 14 species of Bradina have been recorded from adjacent countries, including China and Japan (Leech et al., 1901; Yamanaka, 1984; Nuss et al., 2003-2024; Guo and Du, 2023; Jinbo and Suzuki, 2026). In South Korea, five species of Bradina have previously been recorded (KSAE and ESK, 2021): B. angustalisYamanaka, 1984, B. atopalis (Walker, 1859), B. erilitoidesStrand, 1919, B. geminalisCaradja, 1927, and B. trigonalisYamanaka, 1984. However, B. admixtalis (Walker, 1859), a widely distributed species originally described from Sri Lanka, has not previously been recorded from South Korea.
In the present study, we report B. admixtalis for the first time from South Korea. We provide taxonomic information based on South Korean specimens of B. admixtalis, including description, images of morphological characters with genitalia, and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) barcode sequences. We also compare and analyze the COI barcodes of South Korean specimens with other regional records previously published to discuss the barcode variation within the species currently identified as B. admixtalis.
Materials and Methods
The morphological characteristics of Bradina admixtalis were examined using a Leica Ivesta 3 stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at magnifications ranging from 6× to 55×. The morphological terminology mainly followed Heppner (1998), Maes (1995), and Tuxen (1970). The synonymic lists for the genus Bradina and B. admixtalis follow Nuss et al. (2003-2024).
A series of raw images were captured under a Canon EOS 7D digital camera (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) attached to a Canon EF 100 mm F2.8 Macro USM lens (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Images of the genitalia were taken with a Dhyana 400DC camera (Tucsen Photonics, Fuzhou, China) mounted on a Leica DM3000 LED microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, HESSE, Germany). The images were combined using Helicon Focus software v8.2.18 (Helicon Soft, Ltd., Kharkiv, Ukraine). Minor adjustments to levels and background clean-up were made using Adobe Photoshop 26.0.0 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and Adobe Illustrator v29.8.6 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
Total genomic DNA was extracted from the legs using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Two specimens were sequenced for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) barcoding. The standard barcode region (658 bp) was amplified using primers LepF1/LepR1 (Hebert et al., 2004). PCR was performed using SolgTM 2X Taq PCR Pre-Mix (SolGent, Daejeon, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplicons were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea).
For phylogenetic analysis, we downloaded the barcode sequences of 76 individuals of Bradina and two spilomeline species (as outgroups), which are publicly available from the BOLD Systems (www.boldsystems.org; as of May 2026) and NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; as of May 2026). The sequences were assembled and aligned in Geneious Prime v2026.0.2 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted using IQ-TREE v3.0.1 (Wong et al., 2026) under the GTR+I+G nucleotide substitution model. Branch support was assessed using 10,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates (Hoang et al., 2018).
Taxonomic Accounts
Family Crambidae Latreille, 1810
Subfamily Spilomelinae Guenée, 1854
Genus Bradina Lederer, 1863
BradinaLederer, 1863: 424. Type species: Bradina impressalisLederer, 1863, subsequent designation by Hampson, 1896.
ErilitaLederer, 1863: 426. Type species: Erilita modestalisLederer, 1863, by monotypy.
PleonectusaLederer, 1863: 426. Type species: Botys admixtalisWalker, 1859a; subsequent designation by Moore, [1885].
TrematarchaMeyrick, 1886: 233. Type species: Marasmia erilitalisFelder, Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875; subsequent designation by Klima, 1937.
Bradina admixtalis (Walker, 1859)
Botys admixtalisWalker, 1859a: 665. Type locality: Sri Lanka (Ceylon).
Botys panaeusalisWalker, 1859b: 998. Type locality: Sri Lanka (Ceylon).
Pleonectusa tabidalisLederer, 1863: 426, 481. Type locality: Ambon Island (Amboina), Moluccas, Indonesia.
Pleonectusa sodalisLederer, 1863: 426, 481, 482. Type locality: Ambon Island (Amboina), Moluccas, Indonesia.
Botys leptogastralisWalker, 1866: 1432-1433. Type locality: New Guinea.
Spoladea avunculalisSaalmüller, 1880: 300. Type locality: Madagascar.
Pleonectusa pallidalisWarren, 1896: 147. Type locality: Khasi Hills (Khasias), Meghalaya, India.
Diagnosis. This species is externally similar to B. geminalis, B. macaralis (Walker, 1859), and B. triangularisSeizmair, 2021. These species share a combination of following external characters [extracted and modified from Seizmair (2021)]: 1) concolorous forewing and hindwing ground; 2) subcostal stripe present; 3) forewing postmedial line distinctly present and angulated between RS1 and RS4; 4) forewing antemedial line absent; and 5) hindwing postmedial line present. B. admixtalis can be distinguished from these species by the following combination of characters [extracted and modified from Mathew and Menon (1986) and Seizmair (2021)]: 1) labial palpus bicolor with basal two-thirds white and distal brown (Fig. 1B); 2) juxta bilobed, distally narrow (Fig. 2A); 3) costa angulated at basal one-third and rounded apically (Fig. 2A); 4) inner sclerite of valva with inwardly curved spine-like process (surrounded by red dash line in Fig. 2B); 5) sacculus sclerotized and tapered apically (Fig. 2A); and 6) phallus slender, swollen distally, and notched apically (Fig. 2C, D).
Description (male). Wingspan 22–25mm. Head (Fig. 1A, B). Frons brown; vertex yellowish white; antenna pale yellow; maxillary palpus brown or dark brown; labial palpus bicolorous with basal two-thirds white and distal brown; patagium yellowish brown; tegula pale yellowish brown. Thorax (Fig. 1A). Pale yellowish brown with silvery grey scale. Wing (Fig. 1A). Forewing long and slender with yellowish brown in ground color; antemedial line absent; postmedial line slightly curved between RS3 and RS4; terminal line dark brown; discocellular spot dark brown; costa basally dark brown, gradually fading to forewing ground color; cilia pale brown; hindwing yellowish brown in ground color with postmedial line slightly angulated; terminal line dark brown; discocellular spot dark brown; cilia pale brown. Abdomen (Fig. 1B). Yellowish brown to brown with silvery grey band in posterior margin of each tergite. Male genitalia (Fig. 2A–D). Uncus constricted medially, basal half broadened, distal half slender and elongate, apex clavate and densely setose; juxta bilobed, distally narrow; costa angulated at basal one-third and rounded apically; valva oval shaped with one long tuft of setae extending from the middle to distal portion; inner sclerite of valva with inwardly curved spine-like process; sacculus sclerotized and tapered apically; saccus subtrapezoidal; phallus slender, swollen distally, and notched apically.
Material examined. Korea: 1♂, Incheon Metropolitan City, Ongjin-gun, Deokjeok-myeon, Jin-ri, Mt. Bijobong, N37°13′17.3″ E126°07′25.9″, 17.IX.2014, S.-Y. Park, I.-J. Choi, and Y.-M. Shin; 1♂, Chungcheongnam-do, Taean-gun, Anmyeon-eup, Seungeon-ri, Anmyeondo–Natural Recreation Forest near, N36°29′59.8″ E126°21′40.3″, 8.VI.2015, S.-Y. Park, Y.-M. Shin, and M.-H. Kim.
Distribution. Afrotropical: Comoros, Madagascar, Réunion, Mauritius; Oriental: Chagos, India, Indonesia (Bali, Java), Malaysia (Perak), Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Maldives; Australian: Australia, New Zealand; Palaearctic: China, Japan (Hampson, 1896; Ades and Kendrick, 2004; Bippus, 2019; Singh et al., 2022), and South Korea (new record).
DNA barcode. Sequences were uploaded to NCBI (Accession number: PZ274113, PZ274114).
Remarks. A total of 47 publicly available sequences labelled as Bradina admixtalis were retrieved from BOLD DB and GenBank and included in the COI dataset. The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3) showed that the sequences identified as B. admixtalis were not recovered as a single monophyletic clade, but were separated into several divergent COI lineages. The two Korean specimens examined in the present study were placed in Group 1 together with other Korean samples and several South Asian samples from India and Pakistan. The identification of the present specimens is supported by examination of the genitalia and comparison with the description in Mathew and Menon (1986). Previous faunal literature and checklist records have treated B. admixtalis as a broadly distributed species in the Oriental and East Palaearctic regions. Hampson (1896) recorded this species from Japan, India, Ceylon, Burma, and Perak, and subsequent records have also indicated its occurrence in China and Japan (Shibuya, 1929; Ades and Kendrick, 2004; De Prins and De Prins, 2011-2026). Therefore, the present record from South Korea can be interpreted as an additional East Asian record of this species rather than an isolated occurrence outside its previously known range.
In the COI analysis, the two Korean specimens examined in the present study were placed in Group 1 together with other Korean samples and several South Asian samples from India and Pakistan. This placement is geographically compatible with the type locality of B. admixtalis in Sri Lanka. In contrast, Groups 2-4 consist mainly of Afrotropical samples, whereas Group 5, comprising samples from Bangladesh and Australia, is clearly separated from the other B. admixtalis lineages. Therefore, the broad distribution currently attributed to B. admixtalis should be interpreted cautiously, because publicly available COI barcode sequences assigned to this species were separated into several divergent lineages. This pattern may reflect misidentifications, unrecognized cryptic diversity, or incomplete taxonomic revision of B. admixtalis-like species. Further examination of external morphology and genitalia is needed to clarify the taxonomic status and distributional limits of B. admixtalis across its reported range.












KSAE